Journal of Neurotrauma
Not a subscriber? Get started...Pathology Dynamics Predict Spinal Cord Injury Therapeutic Success
To cite this article:
Cassie S. Mitchell and Robert H. Lee and. Journal of Neurotrauma.
December 2008,
25(12): 1483-1497.
doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0658.
Published in Volume: 25 Issue 12: October 6, 2010
Online Ahead of Print: January 6, 2009
- Full Text HTML
- Full Text PDF (704.2 KB)
- Full Text PDF with Links (532.8 KB)
Author information
ABSTRACT
Abstract
Secondary injury, the complex cascade of cellular events following spinal cord injury (SCI), is a major source of post-insult neuron death. Experimental work has focused on the details of individual factors or mechanisms that contribute to secondary injury, but little is known about the interactions among factors leading to the overall pathology dynamics that underlie its propagation. Prior hypotheses suggest that the pathology is dominated by interactions, with therapeutic success lying in combinations of neuroprotective treatments. In this study, we provide the first comprehensive, system-level characterization of the entire secondary injury process using a novel relational model methodology that aggregates the findings of ~250 experimental studies. Our quantitative examination of the overall pathology dynamics suggests that, while the pathology is initially dominated by “fire-like,” rate-dependent interactions, it quickly switches to a “flood-like,” accumulation-dependent process with contributing factors being largely independent. Our evaluation of ~20,000 potential single and combinatorial treatments indicates this flood-like pathology results in few highly influential factors at clinically realistic treatment time frames, with multi-factor treatments being merely additive rather than synergistic in reducing neuron death. Our findings give new fundamental insight into the understanding of the secondary injury pathology as a whole, provide direction for alternative therapeutic strategies, and suggest that ultimate success in treating SCI lies in the pursuit of pathology dynamics in addition to individually involved factors.
This paper was cited by:
Users who read this article also read
![]() | Atsuhiro Nakagawa, Geoffrey T. Manley, Alisa D. Gean, Kiyonobu Ohtani, Rocco Armonda, Akira Tsukamoto, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi Takayama, Teiji Tominaga |
![]() | Hong-Cai Wang, Zhi-Xin Duan, Fang-Fang Wu, Le Xie, Hong Zhang, Yan-Bin Ma |
![]() | Michael G. Fehlings, Nicholas Theodore, James Harrop, Gilles Maurais, Charles Kuntz, Chris I. Shaffrey, Brian K. Kwon, Jens Chapman, Albert Yee, Allyson Tighe, Lisa McKerracher |
![]() | Klaas A. Hartholt, Esther M.M. Van Lieshout, Suzanne Polinder, Martien J.M. Panneman, Tischa J.M. Van der Cammen, Peter Patka |
![]() | Jed A. Hartings, Anthony J. Strong, Martin Fabricius, Andrew Manning, Robin Bhatia, Jens P. Dreier, Anna Teresa Mazzeo, Frank C. Tortella, M. Ross Bullock |
![]() | Karim Fouad, Mousumi Ghosh, Romana Vavrek, Arthur D. Tse, Damien D. Pearse |
Publication Tools
- Help with PDFs
- Add to my favorites
- Email to a colleague
- Reprints
- Permissions
- Sign up for TOC alerts
-
Citation Alert
- Recommend this title to your librarian
- Most read articles
- Most recently read articles
- Most cited articles
- Most recently cited articles
Share & Recommend
- Related articles in Liebert Online



Previous Article

