Skip Navigation

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Not a subscriber? Get started...

The Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During Pregnancy of Women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Accuracy Assessment

To cite this article:
Anneloes Kerssen, Harold W. De Valk, and Gerard H.A. Visser. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. October 2004, 6(5): 645-651. doi:10.1089/dia.2004.6.645.

Published in Volume: 6 Issue 5: October 12, 2004

Author information

Anneloes Kerssen, M.D.
Departments of Perinatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harold W. De Valk, Ph.D.
Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gerard H.A. Visser, Ph.D.
Departments of Perinatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

ABSTRACT

Background: The Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS®, Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) allows close monitoring of glucose patterns and might be helpful in explaining the persistence of high complication rates in pregnancies of women with type 1 diabetes. It was the aim of this study to determine whether the CGMS accurately reflects glucose levels in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: Fifteen pregnant women with type 1 diabetes used the CGMS and were asked to determine at least seven fingerstick blood glucose levels each day, of which four were used for calibration. The patients were asked to keep a diary of the non-calibration blood glucose values. The accuracy of the CGMS was studied by comparing the non-calibration blood glucose values with simultaneously measured sensor glucose values using the Pearson correlation coefficient, the mean of absolute differences, and the Clarke error grid analysis.

Results: A total of 239 non-calibration blood glucose values were analyzed. The correlation coefficient between non-calibration blood glucose and sensor glucose value was 0.94 (P < 0.001). The mean of the absolute difference was 0.74 mmol/L. Of the non-calibration data 93.8% fell in the clinically acceptable zone of the Clarke error grid analysis.

Conclusions: The CGMS is an accurate tool for additional glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

This paper was cited by:

Patient satisfaction and barriers to initiating real-time continuous glucose monitoring in early pregnancy in women with diabetes
A. L. Secher, A. B. Madsen, L. Ringholm, C. Barfred, E. Stage, H. U. Andersen, P. Damm, E. R. Mathiesen
Diabetic Medicine. Aug 2011: no-no
CrossRef
Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose-monitoring system in critically ill patients*
Richard Brunner, Reinhard Kitzberger, Wolfgang Miehsler, Harald Herkner, Christian Madl, Ulrike Holzinger
Critical Care Medicine. Apr 2011, Vol. 39, No. 4: 659-664
CrossRef
Effect of Islet Transplantation on Metabolic Glucose Control in Rats with Diabetes
Roberta Cornolti, Irene Cattaneo, Matteo Trudu, Marina Figliuzzi, Andrea Remuzzi
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. Dec 2009, Vol. 11, No. 12: 805-811
Abstract | Full Text PDF or HTML | Reprints | Permissions
Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Pregnancy
Lironn Chitayat, Howard Zisser, Lois Jovanovič
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. Jun 2009, Vol. 11, No. s1: S-105-S-111
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints | Permissions
A Tale of Two Compartments: Interstitial Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring
Eda Cengiz, William V. Tamborlane
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. Jun 2009, Vol. 11, No. s1: S-11-S-16
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints | Permissions
Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Monitoring System in diabetic mothers during labour and postnatal glucose adaptation of their infants
E. Stenninger, A. Lindqvist, J. Åman, I. Östlund, E. Schvarcz
Diabetic Medicine. Apr 2008, Vol. 25, No. 4: 450-454
CrossRef
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes
Diane Farrar, Derek J Tuffnell, Jane West, Diane Farrar
. Jul 2007
CrossRef
The role of continuous glucose monitoring in clinical decision-making in diabetes in pregnancy
Kylie McLACHLAN, Alicia JENKINS, David O?NEAL
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Jun 2007, Vol. 47, No. 3: 186-190
CrossRef
Recent progress in analytical instrumentation for glycemic control in diabetic and critically ill patients
Venkata Radhakrishna Kondepati, H. Michael Heise
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. May 2007, Vol. 388, No. 3: 545-563
CrossRef
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology Delivers Detailed Diabetes Data
David C. Klonoff
Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology. Sep 2006, Vol. 5, No. 3: 105-111
CrossRef
Glucose Sensors
Farbod N. Rahaghi, David A. Gough
. Apr 2006
CrossRef
Forty-eight-hour first-trimester glucose profiles in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a report of three cases of congenital malformation
Anneloes Kerssen, Harold W. de Valk, Gerard H. A. Visser
Prenatal Diagnosis. Feb 2006, Vol. 26, No. 2: 123-127
CrossRef
Do HbA1c levels and the self-monitoring of blood glucose levels adequately reflect glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus?
A. Kerssen, H. W. Valk, G. H. A. Visser
Diabetologia. Jan 2006, Vol. 49, No. 1: 25-28
CrossRef
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes
DJ Tuffnell, J West, D Farrar, Diane Farrar
. Oct 2005
CrossRef
Validation of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) by the Use of Two CGMS Simultaneously in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Anneloes Kerssen, Harold W. De Valk, Gerard H.A. Visser
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. Oct 2005, Vol. 7, No. 5: 699-706
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints | Permissions
Analysis: How to Inspect When She's Expecting: Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes During Pregnancy
Stuart A. Weinzimer
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. Oct 2005, Vol. 7, No. 5: 707-709
First Page | Full Text PDF | Reprints | Permissions

Users who read this article also read

no access
Lironn Chitayat, Howard Zisser, Lois Jovanovič
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. June 2009: S-105-S-111.
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints | Permissions
no access
Timothy Lonergan, Aaron Le Compte, Mike Willacy, J. Geoffrey Chase, Geoffrey M. Shaw, Christopher E. Hann, Thomas Lotz, Jessica Lin, Xing-Wei Wong
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. August 2006: 449-462.
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints | Permissions
no access
Michael Fiedler
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. January 2012: 61-62.
First Page | Full Text PDF or HTML | Reprints | Permissions
no access
Ronald J. Pettis, Barry Ginsberg, Laurence Hirsch, Diane Sutter, Steven Keith, Elaine McVey, Noel G. Harvey, Marcus Hompesch, Leszek Nosek, Christoph Kapitza, Lutz Heinemann
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. April 2011: 435-442.
Abstract | Full Text PDF or HTML | Reprints | Permissions
no access
Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr, Vladimir Tolmachev, Bo Stenerlöw
Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals. August 2011: 469-475.
Abstract | Full Text PDF or HTML | Reprints | Permissions
no access
Shun-Chuan Ho, Ping-Ho Ting, Dong-Yih Bau, Chun-Chung Wei
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. September 2011: 541-545.
Abstract | Full Text PDF or HTML | Reprints | Permissions

Sign up for TOC Alerts


Publication Tools

  • Related articles in Liebert Online

Search:

for

Authors:

Keyword:

Go to Advanced Search